• Housework, Dirty Dishes, Complementarianism and Personal Anecdotes

Housework, Dirty Dishes, Complementarianism and Personal Anecdotes

In most of the relationships and marriages I have personally known, the males are the gold-diggers who sit around all day watching football, going bar-hopping during the day, or playing games on the internet all day, while their wife or girlfriend holds down a full time job, pays all the bills, and also comes home to take care of the house-work because the lazy slobby men won’t clean dishes, fold laundry, or do anything else.

Doing housework is not rooted in gender.

A lot of biblical passages complementarians point to in order to substantiate their claims are not intended to be timeless directives, but were products of their time and meant for their time period or locale only.

There’s nothing in the Bible that teaches that washing dirty dishes or cleaning laundry is “woman’s work” or that says women are better suited for, or designed by God more so than a man, to clean a dirty house ( see “Workers at home” or “keepers at home” in Titus 2:5? and “Busy at Home”: How does Titus 2:4-5 apply today? )

I am a little puzzled, then, by complementarians who keep behaving as though American women in the year 2017 are still living in the same conditions, societal expectations, or value systems as American women of the 1950s, or the ancient Greeks and Romans with whom Paul visited, wrote to, or visited.

Some women today aren’t even getting married. Some of them don’t want to. Some want to but can’t find a decent guy to marry.

New study: Women don’t want to get married just because men make more money

Economists: Men now need more than just money to be ‘marriageable’

A lot of men are staying single longer or not marrying at all.

If complementarians keep pushing this antiquated, sexist, insulting notion that housework is for women only, any men who remain single past the age of 21 or 25, especially if they move out and live on their own, are in for a rude awakening. Men will have to learn to cook for themselves, do their own laundry, and clean their own dishes, because there is no wife to do those things for them.

In yet other complementarian material I’ve seen (eg., see my other post, where I mention Doug Wilson), the male complementarians seem to assume that not only is cleaning dirty dishes and such “woman’s responsibility,” but they seem to assume women are the ones shirking this duty and need to be rebuked or cajoled into doing so by their husbands or church elders.

This was originally on Wartburg Watch blog, regarding a ridiculous post complementariain Doug Wilson wrote a couple of years ago, where Wilson feels that a wife who refuses to clean dirty dishes should be reprimanded by church elders:

Step 2 For the little woman who continues to rebel, call in the elders! I kid you not.

[by Doug Wilson]:

If she [the wife who won’t clean the dishes] rebels, he must call the elders of the church and ask them for a pastoral visit. When the government of the home has failed to such an extent, and a godly and consistent attempt by the husband to restore the situation has broken down, then the involvement of the elders is fully appropriate.

In reality, the opposite is true.

Men, even in live-in relationships or marriages where the woman works in an office job, have to be nagged, pressured, begged into doing their fair share of the housework. Women still end up doing the majority of the house-work.

So why am I not seeing the Doug Wilsons and other peddlers of Christian Sexism (also known as “complementarianism”) telling men to step up, stop taking advantage of their girlfriends and wives, and do their fair share of housework?

I’m going to share some personal anecdotes.

My older sister Marge (not her real name) had a live-in boyfriend for a long time.

Although the boyfriend of hers, Roger, was usually not employed during the duration of their time together, and my sister would work 10 – 12 hours per day at her job, she would come home after a day at work to find Roger had not done a blessed thing while she was out.

Roger would not do laundry, scrub the bathroom, clean the carpets, dust furniture, pick up brik a brak around the house, and had to be nagged by her into taking the trash out once per week.

This guy not only left most of the house work up to my sister, but the few times he took the trash out (as he was supposed to do, as they had agreed upon), he expected a thank you or a pat on the head from my sister.

Uh no, buddy. You’re an adult. You’re supposed to be taking out the trash. My sister did not owe you a “thank you” for doing what you were supposed to be doing in the first place.

I asked my sister if Roger ever thanked her for all the dirty dishes she cleaned, all the times she cleaned his laundry, swept their floors and so on, and she said, “No.”

For a few years, I was engaged to a guy, whom I shall call Walter.

Walter was financially inept. He kept borrowing money from me, thousands, but would never pay me back. After a few years of this, I told him that in order for me to consider him husband-material he had to start paying his bills on time, stop asking me for money, and he had to repay me everything he borrowed so far.

I was raised that a guy should be the breadwinner in the relationship. I have a very hard time shaking that value myself. It’s how I was raised – you don’t marry a guy unless he has a steady job, is a good provider, and is not irresponsible.

As our relationship dragged on, Roger not only did not pay me back, but one day he called me to ask me to drive 45 minutes to his apartment to clean his dirty dishes for him.

Roger had the sort of job that took him away for two weeks at a time. (He didn’t have a normal “9 to 5, Monday through Friday” job like most do.)

Any time before Roger’s boss sent him out, his boss always gave him 2 or 3 days prior notice. Roger always knew when he had to leave home.

This one day on the phone, Roger was asking me to drive to his apartment to clean his dishes.

He said, “If you don’t go to my apartment and clean them for me now, when I get back in two weeks, they will be moldy and flies will be buzzing every where.”

I said, “Is this a last minute deal? Did your boss not let you know he was sending you out today?”

Walt said, “No, I knew two or three days ago.”

I said, “If you knew 2 – 3 days ago, you had the last 2 to 3 days to clean your nasty dishes. Why are you asking me now?”

Walter, my ex fiance, is one of these lazy, gross types who literally would stack dirty dishes up in his sink until they were 2 to 4 feet high. I am completely serious about that. I am not exaggerating. Instead of cleaning off each dish after he was done, or cleaning off every two or three set of dishes, he would let them pile up until there was a mountain of filthy, food crusted dishes (and utensils) in his sink.

I should also explain that I was not responsible for a single dirty dish in Walter’s sink. All those dishes were of his doing. I had not eaten off a single one.

I told Walter on the phone I refused to get into my car and spend 45 minutes on the road to drive to his place and back, all to wash a stack of cruddy dishes that were four feet high.

Walter got more and more irate with me (dude always expected me to cave in, so he would get his way each time, which he usually did), and he said, “You’re always saying I have to prove I’m husband-material to you, well now, you need to prove you’re wife material to me.”

I told him, Hell No. He was comparing apples to oranges.

Me asking him to be more financially responsible, stop being late on bills, and to pay me back what he owed me (thousands of dollars!!) was NOT the same thing as asking me to drive 45 minutes to clean some plates HE MADE DIRTY and was too lazy and irresponsible to wash in the three days he knew he had before he had to leave. Those plates were his responsibility, not mine.

So, I never did clean those dirty dishes.

On other occasions in the past, I had vacuumed and dusted his apartment, scrubbed his shower and toilet, and mopped his cruddy kitchen floor.

 On another occasion, Walt had phoned me at 2 A.M. with flu-like symptoms (he said he had the chills, too), begging me to drive over (40 min drive) to see him.

I told him I had the flu before, he’d be fine on his own, I didn’t want to drive over until 10 AM the next day. I have had the flu before and didn’t have anyone to wait on ME hand and foot, so he too could survive it. That wasn’t good enough.

He threw a fit and a pity party, so I went to an all-night Wal-Mart close to his place, where I bought him cough syrup, a bucket to puke in, and their only electric blanket (sucker costed 90 bucks!)

I then went to his place, gave him all the stuff.

So believe you me, I more than once went the long distance and cared for that doofus, even when it was inconvenient for me, even when it meant cleaning up his dirt and crud.

Walt later loaned the electric blanket ($90 blanket) I bought to his mother, who broke the dial thing on it, which rendered it useless.

Any time I bought anything for that idiot or for his apartments (even if it was brand new, right out of the box), he’d either stain it, break it, or give it to his family to borrow, who’d in turn break it or lose it. You could not own or buy or have anything nice around Walt. It was beyond annoying.

Anyway, you have this situation where Walt dirtied up some dishes on his own, waited until he got on the road to call me to demand I wash his dirty dishes for him, out of some so-called wifely duty (even though we were engaged, not married). How would a sexist such as Doug Wilson respond to this?

I have an Aunt who works full time, and her oaf of a spouse sits around in stupid over-alls all day either watching football or visits bars. The oaf does not do housework. My aunt has to do it when she returns home, or it won’t get done.

Other than one or two couples I know of (my parents included), I don’t know of these June and Ward Cleaver marriages where the guy works all day and the wife does all the chores.

Most couples I know, the woman has a job, pays the bills AND does all the housework.

So, I do not recognize this complementarian fantasy world where you have a traditional couple but the wife enjoys housework (my mother did it but didn’t seem to love it), and the wife refuses to do the housework.

I usually see men exploiting women, financially and house-work wise.

Why doesn’t Doug Wilson tell the Walters of the world to clean their own dirty damn dishes?

 Why isn’t Wilson or John Piper and the rest of these sexist jerk-weeds writing blog posts telling men to stop taking advantage of women and step up to the plate and lend a hand?


For additional reading (other sites):

“Workers at home” or “keepers at home” in Titus 2:5?

“Busy at Home”: How does Titus 2:4-5 apply today?

Working women ‘still do housework’ 

Men who help with housework ‘have more and better sex’ – 2015

Researchers find that men who make fair contribution to housework have better sex life after studying 1,300 couples

Yes, Couples Who Share Chores Have More Sex – 2016

A new study debunks the ‘difference equals desire’ theory

A study to be published in the Journal of Marriage and Family in August has found that among couples who share their chores more evenly, there is more sexual gratification. In fact, say the researchers, the only couples reporting having more sex than their forebears did are those who are both getting busy with the household duties. (Sexual frequency has declined globally in the past few decades, even before Netflix.)

This is significant, because as recently as 2013, there was a widespread belief that when men and women strayed into each other’s domestic territory, they didn’t find each other as desirable. The thinking was that guys who did the washing up and women who changed the oil on the family car were somehow muting their masculinity or femininity and thus sending less robust come-hither sexual signals.

The new study, out of Cornell University, says the old data, which prompted a New York Times magazine cover story and such headlines as “Difference Equals Desire” was old and that newer statistics report the opposite effect.

Yes, Men Should Do More Housework

Women at Work: We’re Doing All the ‘Office Housework,’ Too – 2015

Women cheat on them when men shirk housework – 2016

73% women in online poll say this was the reason why they were driven to infidelity

Why It Matters That Women Do Most of the Housework  – 2014

There’s no biological explanation for why women end up doing more housework, so it must stem from societal forces.

Today’s women spend more time in paid employment but still come home to the second shift. On the typical day, nearly half of them will do housework, but just 20 percent of men will do the same.

And women put more time into scrubbing the toilet or doing the laundry—three more hours each week than men. Men carve out three more hours of leisure time.

Even mothers who work full-time will still put in a week and a half’s worth more time on household tasks than their male partners each year. When the division of household labor falls along gender lines, where can we turn for an explanation?

But there’s no biological determinant for housework. No gender is physically predisposed to want to do the dishes or take out the trash.

At least one cause of the housework gap can be traced back to childhood chores. A variety of studies have found that girls are asked to do more work around the house than boys.

One study found that girls did two more hours of chores a week while boys got twice as much time to play. This dynamic carries a lesson for both genders: girls learn that housework falls on their shoulders, and boys learn that girls will clean up after them.

The gendered disparity doesn’t end at time and effort, either. Girls may do more housework, but they don’t get as much pay for it.

…The study finding that girls do two more hours of chores per week also found that boys are 15 percent more likely to get an allowance for doing them. And when they do get paid for it, girls will get less.

The lesson: boys are doing something special to be rewarded when they do a load of laundry or mow the lawn, while girls are doing something “natural” that doesn’t require remuneration.

There’s evidence that we carry these experiences as we age. One study found that boys who grew up only with sisters are 13.5 percent more conservative in their views of women’s roles compared to boys who grew up only with brothers. The researchers speculate that because their sisters are given the housework, those boys tend to assume domestic chores are women’s work.

There’s another school of thought, of course, that women just have higher cleanliness standards. “Men are dirty pigs who don’t care!” the thinking goes. But this too is at heart a social construction that culture inculcates in both genders.

And any woman who wants to change this dynamic confronts another problem. What man has been called a nag? But when women ask that their husbands pitch in more, they run the risk of conjuring up this old label. A nag is just a person making a request that annoys the requestee.

Women are told by parents, advertising agencies and a host of other societal forces that they are responsible for making the house clean, and when they push back, they are slapped with a pejorative.

No wonder they spend so much more time tidying up. It might be more exhausting to try and have it any other way.

“Men believe in housework fairies”: Women on why they still do more chores than men – 2016

It turns out that you ARE doing the dishes because of the patriarchy.

Emasculated Men Refuse to Do Chores—Except Cooking – 2016

…According to their findings, men especially avoid housework just when you’d think they would pick up the slack: When they make less than their wives do.

Overall in the U.S., women clean more than men do. American men did an average of 15 minutes of housework each day, while women did 45, the Cassinos write. Most men—77 percent—did no housework on any given day, while most women—55 percent—did at least some.


More:

Yes, Complementarianism Infantilizes Women – and the Complementarian Tie-Breaking Vote Doctrine

Christian Gender Complementarianism is Christian-Endorsed Codependency for Women (And That’s Not A Good Thing)

Even Warm and Fuzy, True, Correctly-Implemented Gender Complementarianism is Harmful to Women, and It’s Still Sexism – Yes All Comps (Refuting “Not All Comps”)

A Response to the Complementarian ‘The Beauty of Womanhood Essay’ by Abagail Dodds

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s