The Semantic Games of Gender Complementarians
The following post relates with another topic that shows how flawed gender complementarianism is.
I may in the future do a separate post about that other, closely related topic, which is: complementarians cannot agree with each other on exactly what complementarianism is, or how it should be lived, so there ends up all sorts of inconsistencies and contradictions among complementarians.
Complementarianism exists on a scale or contiuum from “soft complementarianism” all the way to a more “hard core” version that borders on patriarchy, and there are stops between those two points.
I think what I write about in this post may be more common place among soft or moderate complementarians than among the patriarchal variety.